@article{Allen-2018-Global,
title = "Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data",
author = "Allen, George H. and
David, C{\'e}dric H. and
Andreadis, Konstantinos M. and
Hossain, Faisal and
Famiglietti, J. S.",
journal = "Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 45, Issue 15",
volume = "45",
number = "15",
year = "2018",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union (AGU)",
url = "https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G18-7001",
doi = "10.1029/2018gl077914",
pages = "7551--7560",
abstract = "Earth‐orbiting satellites provide valuable observations of upstream river conditions worldwide. These observations can be used in real‐time applications like early flood warning systems and reservoir operations, provided they are made available to users with sufficient lead time. Yet the temporal requirements for access to satellite‐based river data remain uncharacterized for time‐sensitive applications. Here we present a global approximation of flow wave travel time to assess the utility of existing and future low‐latency/near‐real‐time satellite products, with an emphasis on the forthcoming SWOT satellite mission. We apply a kinematic wave model to a global hydrography data set and find that global flow waves traveling at their maximum speed take a median travel time of 6, 4, and 3 days to reach their basin terminus, the next downstream city, and the next downstream dam, respectively. Our findings suggest that a recently proposed {\mbox{$\leq$}}2‐day data latency for a low‐latency SWOT product is potentially useful for real‐time river applications.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="Allen-2018-Global">
<titleInfo>
<title>Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">George</namePart>
<namePart type="given">H</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Allen</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Cédric</namePart>
<namePart type="given">H</namePart>
<namePart type="family">David</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Konstantinos</namePart>
<namePart type="given">M</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Andreadis</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Faisal</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Hossain</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">J</namePart>
<namePart type="given">S</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Famiglietti</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2018</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 45, Issue 15</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</publisher>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Earth‐orbiting satellites provide valuable observations of upstream river conditions worldwide. These observations can be used in real‐time applications like early flood warning systems and reservoir operations, provided they are made available to users with sufficient lead time. Yet the temporal requirements for access to satellite‐based river data remain uncharacterized for time‐sensitive applications. Here we present a global approximation of flow wave travel time to assess the utility of existing and future low‐latency/near‐real‐time satellite products, with an emphasis on the forthcoming SWOT satellite mission. We apply a kinematic wave model to a global hydrography data set and find that global flow waves traveling at their maximum speed take a median travel time of 6, 4, and 3 days to reach their basin terminus, the next downstream city, and the next downstream dam, respectively. Our findings suggest that a recently proposed łeq2‐day data latency for a low‐latency SWOT product is potentially useful for real‐time river applications.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">Allen-2018-Global</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1029/2018gl077914</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G18-7001</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2018</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>45</number></detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>15</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>7551</start>
<end>7560</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data
%A Allen, George H.
%A David, Cédric H.
%A Andreadis, Konstantinos M.
%A Hossain, Faisal
%A Famiglietti, J. S.
%J Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 45, Issue 15
%D 2018
%V 45
%N 15
%I American Geophysical Union (AGU)
%F Allen-2018-Global
%X Earth‐orbiting satellites provide valuable observations of upstream river conditions worldwide. These observations can be used in real‐time applications like early flood warning systems and reservoir operations, provided they are made available to users with sufficient lead time. Yet the temporal requirements for access to satellite‐based river data remain uncharacterized for time‐sensitive applications. Here we present a global approximation of flow wave travel time to assess the utility of existing and future low‐latency/near‐real‐time satellite products, with an emphasis on the forthcoming SWOT satellite mission. We apply a kinematic wave model to a global hydrography data set and find that global flow waves traveling at their maximum speed take a median travel time of 6, 4, and 3 days to reach their basin terminus, the next downstream city, and the next downstream dam, respectively. Our findings suggest that a recently proposed łeq2‐day data latency for a low‐latency SWOT product is potentially useful for real‐time river applications.
%R 10.1029/2018gl077914
%U https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G18-7001
%U https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gl077914
%P 7551-7560
Markdown (Informal)
[Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data](https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G18-7001) (Allen et al., GWF 2018)
ACL
- George H. Allen, Cédric H. David, Konstantinos M. Andreadis, Faisal Hossain, and J. S. Famiglietti. 2018. Global Estimates of River Flow Wave Travel Times and Implications for Low‐Latency Satellite Data. Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 45, Issue 15, 45(15):7551–7560.