@article{Bondaruk-2020-Assessing,
title = "Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality",
author = "Bondaruk, Ben and
Roberts, Steven A. and
Robertson, Colin",
journal = "Geomatica, Volume 74, Issue 1",
volume = "74",
number = "1",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Canadian Science Publishing",
url = "https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G20-53001",
doi = "10.1139/geomat-2019-0015",
pages = "9--30",
abstract = "The continuous growth of available geospatial data requires new methods for its integration, analysis, and visualization to be explored and implemented in software available to the geospatial community. Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGS) are an emerging method for spatial data handling in the digital earth framework. DGGS are hierarchical data structures for discretizing the Earth{'}s surface that have seen considerable theoretical development over the last two decades. In this paper, four software implementations are reviewed, dggridR, H3, OpenEAGGR, and S2, to explore their potential applications in data modelling and GIS, as well as their performance. These software implementations were also evaluated against the recently published Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) abstract specification. The results indicate great potential and versatility for utilizing such systems in geospatial analysis, if basic methods for converting and handling spatial features are further developed. The performance of these systems is shown to be highly scalable and operational with datasets of various sizes. Yet, it is demonstrated that the current software implementations generally fall short of fulfilling all of the OGC requirements or it was not possible to confirm their compliance. The assessment here identified that further enhancements, endorsement of OGC criteria, and their explicit acknowledgment within official documentation remain key research needs for the evaluated software packages. Further work developing operational DGGS that solve real world problems may promote greater community adoption and integration of DGGS data structures into commonly used geospatial platforms.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="Bondaruk-2020-Assessing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Ben</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Bondaruk</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Steven</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Roberts</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Colin</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Robertson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2020</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Geomatica, Volume 74, Issue 1</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>Canadian Science Publishing</publisher>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>The continuous growth of available geospatial data requires new methods for its integration, analysis, and visualization to be explored and implemented in software available to the geospatial community. Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGS) are an emerging method for spatial data handling in the digital earth framework. DGGS are hierarchical data structures for discretizing the Earth’s surface that have seen considerable theoretical development over the last two decades. In this paper, four software implementations are reviewed, dggridR, H3, OpenEAGGR, and S2, to explore their potential applications in data modelling and GIS, as well as their performance. These software implementations were also evaluated against the recently published Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) abstract specification. The results indicate great potential and versatility for utilizing such systems in geospatial analysis, if basic methods for converting and handling spatial features are further developed. The performance of these systems is shown to be highly scalable and operational with datasets of various sizes. Yet, it is demonstrated that the current software implementations generally fall short of fulfilling all of the OGC requirements or it was not possible to confirm their compliance. The assessment here identified that further enhancements, endorsement of OGC criteria, and their explicit acknowledgment within official documentation remain key research needs for the evaluated software packages. Further work developing operational DGGS that solve real world problems may promote greater community adoption and integration of DGGS data structures into commonly used geospatial platforms.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">Bondaruk-2020-Assessing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1139/geomat-2019-0015</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G20-53001</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2020</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>74</number></detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>1</number></detail>
<extent unit="page">
<start>9</start>
<end>30</end>
</extent>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article
%T Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality
%A Bondaruk, Ben
%A Roberts, Steven A.
%A Robertson, Colin
%J Geomatica, Volume 74, Issue 1
%D 2020
%V 74
%N 1
%I Canadian Science Publishing
%F Bondaruk-2020-Assessing
%X The continuous growth of available geospatial data requires new methods for its integration, analysis, and visualization to be explored and implemented in software available to the geospatial community. Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGS) are an emerging method for spatial data handling in the digital earth framework. DGGS are hierarchical data structures for discretizing the Earth’s surface that have seen considerable theoretical development over the last two decades. In this paper, four software implementations are reviewed, dggridR, H3, OpenEAGGR, and S2, to explore their potential applications in data modelling and GIS, as well as their performance. These software implementations were also evaluated against the recently published Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) abstract specification. The results indicate great potential and versatility for utilizing such systems in geospatial analysis, if basic methods for converting and handling spatial features are further developed. The performance of these systems is shown to be highly scalable and operational with datasets of various sizes. Yet, it is demonstrated that the current software implementations generally fall short of fulfilling all of the OGC requirements or it was not possible to confirm their compliance. The assessment here identified that further enhancements, endorsement of OGC criteria, and their explicit acknowledgment within official documentation remain key research needs for the evaluated software packages. Further work developing operational DGGS that solve real world problems may promote greater community adoption and integration of DGGS data structures into commonly used geospatial platforms.
%R 10.1139/geomat-2019-0015
%U https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G20-53001
%U https://doi.org/10.1139/geomat-2019-0015
%P 9-30
Markdown (Informal)
[Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality](https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G20-53001) (Bondaruk et al., GWF 2020)
ACL
- Ben Bondaruk, Steven A. Roberts, and Colin Robertson. 2020. Assessing the state of the art in Discrete Global Grid Systems: OGC criteria and present functionality. Geomatica, Volume 74, Issue 1, 74(1):9–30.