Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields
Peter J. A. Kleinman, Deanna L. Osmond, Laura E. Christianson, Don Flaten, James A. Ippolito, Helen P. Jarvie, Jason P. Kaye, Kevin W. King, April B. Leytem, Joshua M. McGrath, Nathan O. Nelson, Amy L. Shober, Douglas R. Smith, K. W. Staver, Andrew N. Sharpley
Abstract
Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.- Cite:
- Peter J. A. Kleinman, Deanna L. Osmond, Laura E. Christianson, Don Flaten, James A. Ippolito, Helen P. Jarvie, Jason P. Kaye, Kevin W. King, April B. Leytem, Joshua M. McGrath, Nathan O. Nelson, Amy L. Shober, Douglas R. Smith, K. W. Staver, and Andrew N. Sharpley. 2022. Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2, 7(2).
- Copy Citation:
Export citation
@article{Kleinman-2022-Addressing,
title = "Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields",
author = "Kleinman, Peter J. A. and
Osmond, Deanna L. and
Christianson, Laura E. and
Flaten, Don and
Ippolito, James A. and
Jarvie, Helen P. and
Kaye, Jason P. and
King, Kevin W. and
Leytem, April B. and
McGrath, Joshua M. and
Nelson, Nathan O. and
Shober, Amy L. and
Smith, Douglas R. and
Staver, K. W. and
Sharpley, Andrew N.",
journal = "Agricultural {\&} Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2",
volume = "7",
number = "2",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Wiley",
url = "https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G22-16001",
doi = "10.1002/ael2.20084",
abstract = "Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.",
}
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
<mods ID="Kleinman-2022-Addressing">
<titleInfo>
<title>Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields</title>
</titleInfo>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Peter</namePart>
<namePart type="given">J</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kleinman</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Deanna</namePart>
<namePart type="given">L</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Osmond</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Laura</namePart>
<namePart type="given">E</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Christianson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Don</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Flaten</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">James</namePart>
<namePart type="given">A</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Ippolito</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Helen</namePart>
<namePart type="given">P</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jarvie</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Jason</namePart>
<namePart type="given">P</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Kaye</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Kevin</namePart>
<namePart type="given">W</namePart>
<namePart type="family">King</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">April</namePart>
<namePart type="given">B</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Leytem</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Joshua</namePart>
<namePart type="given">M</namePart>
<namePart type="family">McGrath</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Nathan</namePart>
<namePart type="given">O</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Nelson</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Amy</namePart>
<namePart type="given">L</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Shober</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Douglas</namePart>
<namePart type="given">R</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Smith</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">K</namePart>
<namePart type="given">W</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Staver</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<name type="personal">
<namePart type="given">Andrew</namePart>
<namePart type="given">N</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Sharpley</namePart>
<role>
<roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">author</roleTerm>
</role>
</name>
<originInfo>
<dateIssued>2022</dateIssued>
</originInfo>
<typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">journal article</genre>
<relatedItem type="host">
<titleInfo>
<title>Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2</title>
</titleInfo>
<originInfo>
<issuance>continuing</issuance>
<publisher>Wiley</publisher>
</originInfo>
<genre authority="marcgt">periodical</genre>
<genre authority="bibutilsgt">academic journal</genre>
</relatedItem>
<abstract>Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.</abstract>
<identifier type="citekey">Kleinman-2022-Addressing</identifier>
<identifier type="doi">10.1002/ael2.20084</identifier>
<location>
<url>https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G22-16001</url>
</location>
<part>
<date>2022</date>
<detail type="volume"><number>7</number></detail>
<detail type="issue"><number>2</number></detail>
</part>
</mods>
</modsCollection>
%0 Journal Article %T Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields %A Kleinman, Peter J. A. %A Osmond, Deanna L. %A Christianson, Laura E. %A Flaten, Don %A Ippolito, James A. %A Jarvie, Helen P. %A Kaye, Jason P. %A King, Kevin W. %A Leytem, April B. %A McGrath, Joshua M. %A Nelson, Nathan O. %A Shober, Amy L. %A Smith, Douglas R. %A Staver, K. W. %A Sharpley, Andrew N. %J Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2 %D 2022 %V 7 %N 2 %I Wiley %F Kleinman-2022-Addressing %X Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems. %R 10.1002/ael2.20084 %U https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G22-16001 %U https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20084
Markdown (Informal)
[Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields](https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G22-16001) (Kleinman et al., GWF 2022)
- Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields (Kleinman et al., GWF 2022)
ACL
- Peter J. A. Kleinman, Deanna L. Osmond, Laura E. Christianson, Don Flaten, James A. Ippolito, Helen P. Jarvie, Jason P. Kaye, Kevin W. King, April B. Leytem, Joshua M. McGrath, Nathan O. Nelson, Amy L. Shober, Douglas R. Smith, K. W. Staver, and Andrew N. Sharpley. 2022. Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields. Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2, 7(2).