2019
DOI
bib
abs
Refining the role of phenology in regulating gross ecosystem productivity across European peatlands
Franziska Koebsch,
Oliver Sonnentag,
Järvi Järveoja,
Mikko Peltoniemi,
Pavel Alekseychik,
Mika Aurela,
Ali Arslan,
Kerry J. Dinsmore,
Damiano Gianelle,
Carole Helfter,
Marcin Jackowicz-Korczyński,
Aino Korrensalo,
Fraser Leith,
Maiju Linkosalmi,
Annalea Lohila,
Magnus Lund,
Martin Maddison,
Ivan Mammarella,
Ülo Mander,
Kari Minkkinen,
Amy Pickard,
Johannes Wilhelmus Maria Pullens,
Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila,
Mats Nilsson,
Matthias Peichl
Global Change Biology, Volume 26, Issue 2
The role of plant phenology as a regulator for gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) in peatlands is empirically not well constrained. This is because proxies to track vegetation development with daily coverage at the ecosystem scale have only recently become available and the lack of such data has hampered the disentangling of biotic and abiotic effects. This study aimed at unraveling the mechanisms that regulate the seasonal variation in GEP across a network of eight European peatlands. Therefore, we described phenology with canopy greenness derived from digital repeat photography and disentangled the effects of radiation, temperature and phenology on GEP with commonality analysis and structural equation modeling. The resulting relational network could not only delineate direct effects but also accounted for possible effect combinations such as interdependencies (mediation) and interactions (moderation). We found that peatland GEP was controlled by the same mechanisms across all sites: phenology constituted a key predictor for the seasonal variation in GEP and further acted as a distinct mediator for temperature and radiation effects on GEP. In particular, the effect of air temperature on GEP was fully mediated through phenology, implying that direct temperature effects representing the thermoregulation of photosynthesis were negligible. The tight coupling between temperature, phenology and GEP applied especially to high latitude and high altitude peatlands and during phenological transition phases. Our study highlights the importance of phenological effects when evaluating the future response of peatland GEP to climate change. Climate change will affect peatland GEP especially through changing temperature patterns during plant phenologically sensitive phases in high latitude and high altitude regions.
2018
DOI
bib
abs
Environmental and taxonomic controls of carbon and oxygen stable isotope composition in <i>Sphagnum</i> across broad climatic and geographic ranges
Gustaf Granath,
Håkan Rydin,
Jennifer L. Baltzer,
Fia Bengtsson,
Nicholas Boncek,
Luca Bragazza,
Zhao‐Jun Bu,
S. J. M. Caporn,
Ellen Dorrepaal,
О. В. Галанина,
Mariusz Gałka,
Anna Ganeva,
David P. Gillikin,
Irina Goia,
N. D. Goncharova,
Michal Hájek,
Akira Haraguchi,
Lorna I. Harris,
Elyn Humphreys,
Martin Jiroušek,
Katarzyna Kajukało,
Edgar Karofeld,
Natalia G. Koronatova,
Natalia P. Kosykh,
Mariusz Lamentowicz,
Е. Д. Лапшина,
Juul Limpens,
Maiju Linkosalmi,
Jinze Ma,
Marguerite Mauritz,
Tariq Muhammad Munir,
Susan M. Natali,
Rayna Natcheva,
Maria Noskova,
Richard J. Payne,
Kyle Pilkington,
Sean M. Robinson,
Bjorn J. M. Robroek,
Line Rochefort,
David Singer,
Hans K. Stenøien,
Eeva‐Stiina Tuittila,
Kai Vellak,
Anouk Verheyden,
J. M. Waddington,
Steven K. Rice
Abstract. Rain-fed peatlands are dominated by peat mosses (Sphagnum sp.), which for their growth depend on elements from the atmosphere. As the isotopic composition of carbon (12,13C) and oxygen (16,18O) of these Sphagnum mosses are affected by environmental conditions, the dead Sphagnum tissue accumulated in peat constitutes a potential long-term archive that can be used for climate reconstruction. However, there is a lack of adequate understanding of how isotope values are influenced by environmental conditions, which restricts their current use as environmental and palaeoenvironmental indicators. Here we tested (i) to what extent C and O isotopic variation in living tissue of Sphagnum is species-specific and associated with local hydrological gradients, climatic gradients (evapotranspiration, temperature, precipitation), and elevation; (ii) if the C isotopic signature can be a proxy for net primary productivity (NPP) of Sphagnum; and (iii) to what extent Sphagnum tissue δ18O tracks the δ18O isotope signature of precipitation. In total, we analysed 337 samples from 93 sites across North America and Eurasia using two important peat-forming Sphagnum species (S. magellanicum, S. fuscum) common to the Holartic realm. There were differences in δ13C values between species. For S. magellanicum δ13C decreased with increasing height above the water table (HWT, R2 = 17 %) and was positively correlated to productivity (R2 = 7 %). Together these two variables explained 46 % of the between-site variation in δ13C values. For S. fuscum, productivity was the only significant predictor of δ13C (total R2 = 6 %). For δ18O values, ca. 90 % of the variation was found between sites. Globally-modelled annual δ18O values in precipitation explained 69% of the between-site variation in tissue δ18O. S. magellanicum showed lower δ18O enrichment than S. fuscum (−0.83 ‰ lower) . Elevation and climatic variables were weak predictors of tissue δ18O values after controlling for δ18O values of the precipitation. To summarise, our study provides evidence for (a) good predictability of tissue δ18O values from modelled annual δ18O values in precipitation, and (b) the possibility to relate tissue δ13C values to HWT and NPP, but this appears to be species-dependent. These results suggest that isotope composition can be used at a large scale for climatic reconstructions but that such models should be species-specific.