2020
DOI
bib
abs
Illuminating water cycle modifications and Earth system resilience in the Anthropocene
Tom Gleeson,
Lan Wang‐Erlandsson,
Miina Porkka,
Samuel C. Zipper,
Fernando Jaramillo,
Dieter Gerten,
Ingo Fetzer,
Sarah Cornell,
Luigi Piemontese,
Line Gordon,
Johan Rockström,
Taikan Oki,
Murugesu Sivapalan,
Yoshihide Wada,
Kate A. Brauman,
Martina Flörke,
M. F. Bierkens,
Bernhard Lehner,
Patrick Keys,
Matti Kummu,
Thorsten Wagener,
Simon Dadson,
Tara J. Troy,
Will Steffen,
Malin Falkenmark,
J. S. Famiglietti
Water Resources Research, Volume 56, Issue 4
Fresh water – the bloodstream of the biosphere – is at the centre of the planetary drama of the Anthropocene. Water fluxes and stores regulate the Earth’s climate and are essential for thriving aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems, as well as water, food and energy security. But the water cycle is also being modified by humans at an unprecedented scale and rate. A holistic understanding of freshwater’s role for Earth System resilience and the detection and monitoring of anthropogenic water cycle modifications across scales is urgent, yet existing methods and frameworks are not well suited for this. In this paper we highlight four core Earth System functions of water (hydroclimatic regulation, hydroecological regulation, storage, and transport) and key related processes. Building on systems and resilience theory, we review the evidence of regional-scale regime shifts and disruptions of the Earth System functions of water. We then propose a framework for detecting, monitoring, and establishing safe limits to water cycle modifications, and identify four possible spatially explicit methods for their quantification. In sum, this paper presents an ambitious scientific and policy Grand Challenge that could substantially improve our understanding of the role of water in the Earth System and cross-scale management of water cycle modifications that would be a complementary approach to existing water management tools.
DOI
bib
abs
The Water Planetary Boundary: Interrogation and Revision
Tom Gleeson,
Lan Wang‐Erlandsson,
Samuel C. Zipper,
Miina Porkka,
Fernando Jaramillo,
Dieter Gerten,
Ingo Fetzer,
Sarah Cornell,
Luigi Piemontese,
Line Gordon,
Johan Rockström,
Taikan Oki,
Murugesu Sivapalan,
Yoshihide Wada,
Kate A. Brauman,
Martina Flörke,
M. F. Bierkens,
Bernhard Lehner,
Patrick Keys,
Matti Kummu,
Thorsten Wagener,
Simon Dadson,
Tara J. Troy,
Will Steffen,
Malin Falkenmark,
J. S. Famiglietti
One Earth, Volume 2, Issue 3
The planetary boundaries framework proposes quantified guardrails to human modification of global environmental processes that regulate the stability of the planet and has been considered in sustainability science, governance, and corporate management. However, the planetary boundary for human freshwater use has been critiqued as a singular measure that does not reflect all types of human interference with the complex global water cycle and Earth System. We suggest that the water planetary boundary will be more scientifically robust and more useful in decision-making frameworks if it is redesigned to consider more specifically how climate and living ecosystems respond to changes in the different forms of water on Earth: atmospheric water, frozen water, groundwater, soil moisture, and surface water. This paper provides an ambitious scientific road map to define a new water planetary boundary consisting of sub-boundaries that account for a variety of changes to the water cycle.
2017
DOI
bib
abs
Human–water interface in hydrological modelling: current status and future directions
Yoshihide Wada,
Marc F. P. Bierkens,
Ad de Roo,
Paul A. Dirmeyer,
J. S. Famiglietti,
Naota Hanasaki,
Megan Konar,
Junguo Liu,
Hannes Müller Schmied,
Taikan Oki,
Yadu Pokhrel,
Murugesu Sivapalan,
Tara J. Troy,
Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,
Tim van Emmerik,
M.H.J. van Huijgevoort,
H.A.J. van Lanen,
Charles J Vörösmarty,
Niko Wanders,
H. S. Wheater
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Volume 21, Issue 8
Abstract. Over recent decades, the global population has been rapidly increasing and human activities have altered terrestrial water fluxes to an unprecedented extent. The phenomenal growth of the human footprint has significantly modified hydrological processes in various ways (e.g. irrigation, artificial dams, and water diversion) and at various scales (from a watershed to the globe). During the early 1990s, awareness of the potential for increased water scarcity led to the first detailed global water resource assessments. Shortly thereafter, in order to analyse the human perturbation on terrestrial water resources, the first generation of large-scale hydrological models (LHMs) was produced. However, at this early stage few models considered the interaction between terrestrial water fluxes and human activities, including water use and reservoir regulation, and even fewer models distinguished water use from surface water and groundwater resources. Since the early 2000s, a growing number of LHMs have incorporated human impacts on the hydrological cycle, yet the representation of human activities in hydrological models remains challenging. In this paper we provide a synthesis of progress in the development and application of human impact modelling in LHMs. We highlight a number of key challenges and discuss possible improvements in order to better represent the human–water interface in hydrological models.