Agricultural & Environmental Letters, Volume 7, Issue 2
- Anthology ID:
- G22-123
- Month:
- Year:
- 2022
- Address:
- Venue:
- GWF
- SIG:
- Publisher:
- Wiley
- URL:
- https://gwf-uwaterloo.github.io/gwf-publications/G22-123
- DOI:
Addressing conservation practice limitations and trade‐offs for reducing phosphorus loss from agricultural fields
Peter J. A. Kleinman
|
Deanna L. Osmond
|
Laura E. Christianson
|
Don Flaten
|
James A. Ippolito
|
Helen P. Jarvie
|
Jason P. Kaye
|
Kevin W. King
|
April B. Leytem
|
Joshua M. McGrath
|
Nathan O. Nelson
|
Amy L. Shober
|
Douglas R. Smith
|
K. W. Staver
|
Andrew N. Sharpley
Conservation practices that reduce nutrient and soil loss from agricultural lands to water are fundamental to watershed management programs. Avoiding trade-offs of conservation practices is essential to the successful mitigation of watershed phosphorus (P) losses. We review documented trade-offs associated with conservation practices, particularly those practices that are intended to control and trap P from agricultural sources. A regular theme is the trade-off between controlling P loss linked to sediment while increasing dissolved P losses (no-till, cover crops, vegetated buffers, constructed wetlands, sediment control basins). A variety of factors influence the degree to which these trade-offs occur, complicated by their interaction and uncertainties associated with climate change. However, acknowledging these trade-offs and anticipating their contribution to watershed outcomes are essential to the sustainability of conservation systems.